Why Delta Cancelled Its Boeing 787 Order

Daniel-Fowkes-Profile
23 Sep 2024
4 min read
· Aircraft 
· Airlines 
· Analysis 
A Delta Boeing 787 Dreamliner

Delta once had orders for the Boeing 787 Dreamliner; however, it would go on to never fly the widebody.

The major U.S. carrier’s decision not to fly the aircraft isn’t as simple as an order cancellation; factors such as airline acquisition, fleet review, and more are involved.

The Landmark Boeing 787 Order

While Delta had the 787 on its books, it wasn’t the airline that ordered the aircraft. In fact, Northwest Airlines placed the order in 2005.

This deal consisted of 18 units from the family at the time. At the time, Northwest was still flying daily across a route network that several analysts believed would benefit from Boeing’s delivery of the 787.

By the mid-2000s, the 787 was indeed making its mark before being delivered to airlines that were very interested in the prospects of the new widebody.

SK0711

Additionally, from a purely fleet standpoint for Northwest, the Dreamliner was considered an ideal plane for replacement efforts at the time of inefficient aircraft.

Aircraft orders like these that end up at another airline aren’t uncommon and will typically occur because of a merger/takeover/acquisition. If the latter happens, there will likely be complications regarding aircraft orders that have yet to be fulfilled.

Northwest Becomes No More

For Northwest, a mere half a decade after they purchased the 787 Dreamliner, they’d be absorbed by Delta, and while their memory still lives on to this day, their mere presence exists through Delta rather than their own defined brand.

In some cases, the aircraft the airline takes on as part of the purchase will be axed; maybe some will be retained, or there will be other things to consider.

However, the one underlying point will be that the airlines must come together to review the fleets and determine the best course of action with a genuine sense of direction.

By taking on Northwest, Delta immediately raised questions about the airline’s future strategy and what would come from the Dreamliners.

Saying Goodbye To The 787

This strategic decision-making process is hardly overnight. While it didn’t seem entirely likely that Delta would fly the Boeing 787 Dreamliner, they didn’t precisely outright remove the order.

They delayed and deferred deliveries of the aircraft to give themselves more time to make a firm decision. This is a common practice with airlines around the world for several reasons.

This allowed Delta more time to understand and plot its future. For other airlines, it can be a means to navigate turbulent financial times when they are not in a position to acquire new aircraft or to avoid taking an aircraft they no longer want.

A Shift To Airbus?

Delta’s time of review regarding its fleet saw quite a considerable shift, that is, the shift to Airbus. Delta’s shift to Airbus began in the early to mid-2010s with its first order in multiple decades.

This commitment to the European plane maker, initially for a narrowbody jet, would extend to other aircraft types as the years went by.

The shift meant that Delta’s priorities had changed, and what Airbus was offering them for their future fleet plans was viewed as more optimal, bringing greater efficiency and customer satisfaction.

This shift represents a positive step forward for Delta and its commitment to providing the best possible service to its customers.

A Boeing 787 Order Cancellation

By 2016, Delta’s order for the 787 it had taken on from Northwest would have received the final nail in the coffin, and an order cancellation would come through.

The reasoning behind the cancellation didn’t need to be overly stated. It was pretty much wrapped up with several comments that the decision to move away from the Dreamliner aligned with the airline’s fleet strategy.

It isn’t necessarily a lie that while the 787 brings fantastic levels of comfort, efficiency, and so much else to any prospective company, if the airline is moving in a different direction, adding another aircraft type, especially from another manufacturer, would complicate matters.

While Delta’s fleet was hardly streamlined in the mid-2010s, and the global pandemic allowed them to refine their fleet truly, they knew the basics: more aircraft from different series would overcomplicate matters from crew to maintenance.

Would the 787 have made an excellent addition to the Delta business, or do you think terminating the order makes more sense than retaining it? Let me know.

Daniel-Fowkes-Profile

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Daniel Fowkes

Daniel Fowkes is a Melbourne-based aviation analyst and journalist with over a decade of industry experience. As founder of Dj’s Aviation, he delivers trusted analysis on aircraft, airline strategy and global aviation trends for djsaviation.net

More About Author

Leave a Reply

  1. A pilot and long term Frequent Flier of KLM, I felt the 787 made perfect sense as to what the 787 brought to Delta and to KLM for that fact.

    Time will only tell.

  2. Delta has the larger end of the wide-body market covered with the a330 and a350s. But the low 200 seat range would be best filled by the 787-8. These are the ideal replacement for the aging 767s that delta has currently. The a330-900 are too big and they haven’t ordered any of the smaller a330-800 and neither has virtually anyone else. So what are they going to do to replace the 767s?

  3. I personally love the 787 but I understand & respect Delta’s decision even though I was hoping Delta would buy some 787’s at some point. But that seems unlikely these days. I loved the 777 & I do like the A350 but still prefer the 787.

    1. Why do you prefer the 787. From a passenger standpoint the a350 is superior in all respects. Seat width, noise, in particular. 787 may make more economic sense on many routes, but I don’t know how it’s better for passengers.

      1. After flying on the A350 AND THE B787 BACK TO BACK. THE A350 SEEMED LOUDER AND LESS COMFORTABLE IN COACH CLASS. THIS COMPARISON IS BASE ON SINGAPORE AIRLINES AND THAI AIRLINES JETS. IN MY PERSONAL OPINION THE 787 IS BETTER.

  4. Odd that you don’t mention that Delta already ordered the A350, which is comparable. It would less efficient to operate both the 787 and A350.

  5. As a retired Northwest Airlines mechanic, I worked on mostly Boeing planes. They were great until Boeing management cut corners on manufacturing standards. I’m sorry to see Airbus replacing Boeing planes.

  6. You failed to mention the B787 to launch customer NWA was 7+ years late. It like most Boeing aircraft never meet specifications due to poor wing capabilities and out dated technology like MCAS.
    Boeing lacks everything needed for a global supplier

  7. I am saddened that they canceled an order from an American company to buy from a foreign subsized manufacturer.

Stay Informed

Get the latest aviation news, analysis and route updates delivered to your inbox.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.

Enjoyed this story?

Make us your go-to for aviation news

Add us as a preferred source on Google and see our latest stories first in Top Stories.

Add Us On Your News Feed