
Obtaining necessary approval from regulators for consolidation is always challenging, even more so when another major carrier, such as United Airlines, offers its thoughts.
As part of the big U.S. carrier’s concern with the prospective deal, it has highlighted potential issues with its relationship with Hawaiian Airlines.
United Airlines has a strong presence across Hawaii, from the frequency of flights to the aircraft utilised. However, if Alaska and Hawaiian proceeded with a merger, it would be concerned about the prospective impact.
That impact trickles down to miles being rewarded to passengers when flying around Hawaii, alongside ticket sales on the website.
The prospective deal, valued at almost USD 2 billion, could now be thrown into more turmoil, delaying the finalisation of something already challenging to complete.
There were always to be investigations into the ramifications of competition such a coming together would have, similar to the rejected JetBlue and Spirit prospective deal.
If all were to be approved, the two brands of Alaska and Hawaiian would stay separate, but Hawaiian would fall into Alaska’s hands, and the routes would be transferred, and a takeover would occur.
From here, Alaska Airlines could continue to ensure connectivity between the islands and global locations while also utilizing aircraft such as the 787 and other widebodies.
While United’s concerns are fresh, the response has yet to come. However, there have been murmurs, such as comments regarding prospective loyalty benefits that would align with the oneworld alliance, one of United Airlines is not part of.
United’s feelings were disclosed in a filing, which highlighted the codeshare, interline, and loyalty agreements, among other fundamental avenues of its relationship.
How these comments affect the overall progress of the tie-up between Hawaiian Airlines and Alaska Airlines remains to be seen. However, the consensus is that there could be fresh delays after progress felt like it was being made positively.
Some onlookers have argued that United’s comments are hardly enough to throw the merger out the window and lean more toward United attempting some pushback.
Others, however, argue that United is expressing a feeling broadly felt across the U.S. as other neighbouring companies plan to combat such consolidation efforts.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Daniel Fowkes is a Melbourne-based aviation analyst and journalist with over a decade of industry experience. As founder of Dj’s Aviation, he delivers trusted analysis on aircraft, airline strategy and global aviation trends for djsaviation.net
Leave a Reply
Related Articles
Stay Informed
Get the latest aviation news, analysis and route updates delivered to your inbox.
We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at any time.
Make us your go-to for aviation news
Add us as a preferred source on Google and see our latest stories first in Top Stories.
Add Us On Your News Feed




Funny how United would be concerned about reduced competition when they had zero concern about merging with a much bigger company than Hawaiian is in Continental.